It's time to wake up people. If you were requiring proof to what priorities our president has first, then take a good hard look and listen Because it doesn't get any clearer than this.
If you want to forward this to a friend, do so fast. I doubt the White House will allow this to remain on YouTube.com for long.
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
2 Eagles And A Duck.
This is awesome - be sure to read under each picture!
The fellow sitting on the tailgate of his pickup truck never
Realized the show he was missing.
The little duck watches as the Eagle speeds straight
At him at about 40 mph.
With perfect timing, the duck always dove and escaped with
A mighty splash! Then he'd pop to the surface as soon as
The Eagle flew past. This was repeated over and over for
Several minutes. I worried the poor duck would tire and that
A mighty splash! Then he'd pop to the surface as soon as
The Eagle flew past. This was repeated over and over for
Several minutes. I worried the poor duck would tire and that
Would be the end of him.
A second Eagle joins the attack! The duck kept diving
"just in time", so the Eagles began to dive into the water after him!
After several minutes the Eagles got frustrated and began to
Attack each other. They soon began to dive vertically,
Level out, and attack head-on in a good old-fashioned game
Of high-speed "Chicken". Sometimes they banked away
From each other at the last possible second. Other times
They'd climb vertically and tear into each other while falling
Back toward the water. (The duck catches his breath at the
Attack each other. They soon began to dive vertically,
Level out, and attack head-on in a good old-fashioned game
Of high-speed "Chicken". Sometimes they banked away
From each other at the last possible second. Other times
They'd climb vertically and tear into each other while falling
Back toward the water. (The duck catches his breath at the
Right side of this picture.)
A terrible miscalculation! The luckiest shot of my life catches
This 100 mph head-on collision between two Bald Eagles.
One Eagle stayed aloft and flew away, but the other lies
Motionless in a crumpled heap.
Motionless in a crumpled heap.
The lucky duck survived to live another day.
It's sad to watch an Eagle drown. He wiggled, flapped and
Struggled mostly underwater.. He finally got his head
Above water and with great difficulty managed to get airborne.
To my astonishment, he flew straight toward me,
Struggled mostly underwater.. He finally got his head
Above water and with great difficulty managed to get airborne.
To my astonishment, he flew straight toward me,
And it was the most wretched and unstable bird flight I've ever seen!
The bedraggled Eagle circled me once - then lit atop a nearby fir tree.
He had a six-foot wingspread and looked mighty angry.
I was concerned that I might be his next target, but he was so
Exhausted he just stared at me. Then I wondered if he would topple
To the ground. As he tried to dry his feathers, it seemed to me that
This beleaguered Eagle symbolized America in its current trials.
My half-hour wait was rewarded with this marvelous sight.
He flew away, almost good as new. May America recover as well.
These pictures and narrative were forwarded to me from my father. As I read the story behind each picture I couldn't help but think how these photos accurately summarize the state our country is in. The 2 Eagles show a nation divided. One Conservative, one Liberal / Progressive. Both fighting over who can best the other and at the end achieve nothing near what each set out to accomplish. They each say that mainstream America wants what they have to offer. REALLY?!
As I see it, Tea Party people represent mainstream America. And while 2 "eagles" fight each other, the DUCK ( or Tea Bagger's ) are resting and watching from the sidelines to find out who really does share their concerns for the country and who doesn't. Here is what these independent, mainstream tea baggers have seen so far;
So, is there any doubters among you that can't see just who has YOUR concerns and best represents "mainstream" America and who is wanting to promote an ideology and agenda no matter what the cost? This November's 2010 mid-term elections, we will choose which direction these United States will take. It will be our responsibility to vote our conscience and conviction. However, as often is the case, we need to remember that CHOICES HAVE CONSEQUENCES.
So I ask of you all to choose WISELY.
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
The Desperate Cries Of A Liberal Progressive And His Temper Tantrums.
It is said that adversity will bring out the true character of a person. Well, thanks to the current polls of the Massachusetts Senate race between Martha Coakley and Scott Brown, Keith Olbermann of the MSNBC program COUNTDOWN is showing letting all of America his character. And a day after the Martin Luther King Jr., it is only fair to show you just how Mr. Olbermann handles adversity and the content of his character.
Those who support the Liberal Progressive agenda always say that anyone opposed to their ideology are racist, homophobic or Nazi's. And though I will admit that there might be some that feel this way, it can not and should not be assumed all of us are this way.
Everyone should consider the source of these "tantrums" and why they throw them.
Here are others who throw such tantrums.
I hope you noticed the CNN reporter accusing the woman as "antagonistic".
If we are "antagonistic" it is because the voice of the American mainstream is deliberately being ( at the very least ) ignored or ( being more realistic ) snubbed with insults. Liberalism and political correctness have now put what once was the "AMERICAN WAY" at war with "We The People" and the "Bill of Rights".
The "American Way" included the Bible and God in our schools, opposed abortion and was the light of freedom for the whole world. But thanks to Liberalism and political correctness, God and the Bible have been thrown out along with common sense. And "We The People" over the past 40+ years have little by little surrendered those God given "Bill of Rights" that the founding fathers fought, bled and died for.
Someone once said "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to death your right to say it." I wonder if CNN or the rest of the Liberal Media can say the same.
Somehow, I doubt it.
Those who support the Liberal Progressive agenda always say that anyone opposed to their ideology are racist, homophobic or Nazi's. And though I will admit that there might be some that feel this way, it can not and should not be assumed all of us are this way.
Everyone should consider the source of these "tantrums" and why they throw them.
Here are others who throw such tantrums.
I hope you noticed the CNN reporter accusing the woman as "antagonistic".
If we are "antagonistic" it is because the voice of the American mainstream is deliberately being ( at the very least ) ignored or ( being more realistic ) snubbed with insults. Liberalism and political correctness have now put what once was the "AMERICAN WAY" at war with "We The People" and the "Bill of Rights".
The "American Way" included the Bible and God in our schools, opposed abortion and was the light of freedom for the whole world. But thanks to Liberalism and political correctness, God and the Bible have been thrown out along with common sense. And "We The People" over the past 40+ years have little by little surrendered those God given "Bill of Rights" that the founding fathers fought, bled and died for.
Someone once said "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to death your right to say it." I wonder if CNN or the rest of the Liberal Media can say the same.
Somehow, I doubt it.
Monday, January 4, 2010
The Genesis Of Men And Beer.
While checking my e-mail I came across one that my dad sent that I found humorous. I know that it is fictitious in it's historical references. But it still makes a point of describing today's American political landscape that I just couldn't pass up the opportunity to share it with you.
For those that don't know about history, here is a condensed version:
Humans originally existed as members of small bands of nomadic hunters/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the summer and would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in the winter.
The two most important events in all of history were the invention of beer and the invention of the wheel. The wheel was invented to get man to the beer. These were the foundations of modern civilization and together were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct subgroups:
1. Liberals, and
2. Conservatives.
Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That's how villages were formed.
Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to BBQ at night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as the Conservative movement.
Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly BBQ's and doing the sewing, fetching, and hair dressing. This was the beginning of the Liberal movement.
Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. Those became known as girlie-men. Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of cats, the invention of group therapy, group hugs, and the concept of Democratic voting to decide how to divide the meat and beer that conservatives provided.
Over the years conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolized by the jackass.
Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish but like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard liberal fare. Another interesting evolutionary side note: most of their women have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in Hollywood and group therapists are liberals. Liberals invented the designated hitter rule because it wasn't fair to make the pitcher also bat.
Conservatives drink domestic beer, mostly Bud or Miller. They eat red meat and still provide for their women. Conservatives are big game hunters, rodeo cowboys, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors, police officers, engineers, corporate executives, athletes, members of the military, airline pilots and generally anyone who works productively. Conservatives who own companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living.
Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of the liberals remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to America . They crept in after the Wild West was tamed and created a business of trying to get more for nothing.
Here ends today's lesson in world history:
It should be noted that a Liberal may have a momentary urge to angrily respond to the above before forwarding it.
A Conservative will simply laugh and be so convinced of the absolute truth of this history that it will be forwarded immediately to other true believers and to more liberals just to piss them off.
And there you have it. Let your next action reveal your true self.
For those that don't know about history, here is a condensed version:
Humans originally existed as members of small bands of nomadic hunters/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the summer and would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in the winter.
The two most important events in all of history were the invention of beer and the invention of the wheel. The wheel was invented to get man to the beer. These were the foundations of modern civilization and together were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct subgroups:
1. Liberals, and
2. Conservatives.
Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That's how villages were formed.
Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to BBQ at night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as the Conservative movement.
Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly BBQ's and doing the sewing, fetching, and hair dressing. This was the beginning of the Liberal movement.
Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. Those became known as girlie-men. Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of cats, the invention of group therapy, group hugs, and the concept of Democratic voting to decide how to divide the meat and beer that conservatives provided.
Over the years conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolized by the jackass.
Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish but like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard liberal fare. Another interesting evolutionary side note: most of their women have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in Hollywood and group therapists are liberals. Liberals invented the designated hitter rule because it wasn't fair to make the pitcher also bat.
Conservatives drink domestic beer, mostly Bud or Miller. They eat red meat and still provide for their women. Conservatives are big game hunters, rodeo cowboys, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors, police officers, engineers, corporate executives, athletes, members of the military, airline pilots and generally anyone who works productively. Conservatives who own companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living.
Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of the liberals remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to America . They crept in after the Wild West was tamed and created a business of trying to get more for nothing.
Here ends today's lesson in world history:
It should be noted that a Liberal may have a momentary urge to angrily respond to the above before forwarding it.
A Conservative will simply laugh and be so convinced of the absolute truth of this history that it will be forwarded immediately to other true believers and to more liberals just to piss them off.
And there you have it. Let your next action reveal your true self.
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
It's Hard To Believe That The "Good Old Days" Were Just Last Year.
Next time a person tells you that electing a Democrat would increase your taxes, I suggest you listen.
Under former President George W. Bush, federal spending for 2008 was $2,979 Billion Dollars. It broke down this way:
Fiscal Year 2008 U.S. Federal Spending - Cash or Budget Basis.
Now that Barack Obama is the president and Democrat's have control in both houses of Congress over the past 11 months, you who voted for "change" are now feeling the effects of that change where it hurts the most.
Your WALLETS!
In spite of the August town hall meetings and TEA PARTY protests, those elected officials have continued their pursuit to destroying the way of life our country's founding fathers fought against. TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION! Our country already had a deficit in 2008. And although I would agree that it was somewhat high, that deficit was at least manageable.
With all the spending on Obamacare as well as over 10% unemployment in the country, what's next?
BANKRUPTCY!
Just look at the proposed budget over the next 10 years below.
And this only took 11 months. Aren't any of you afraid of what is in store for America should this continue for the rest of his term? I am. And we still have a year before we can elect the necessary, responsible people able to put a stop to it. WAS THIS THE "CHANGE" YOU WERE LOOKING FOR?
I used to be a member of a Bible group called Prophecy News Watch ( located in Canada ). I left this group because some of its moderators tend to be "censor" happy when it comes to posts they personally disagree with. On one such post I had a theory of a scenario in which an Obama administration would place the country against Israel. The Bible prophesied that during the last days the "whole world" would be against Israel, including the United States. My "theory" ( posted in mid 2008 ) involved the Islamic world was planning and waiting for a president ( Obama ) who would sympathize with them. That through that president, they could ( and would ) destroy America from within. I was CENSORED for my theory by one of their moderators ( Sue ). It "bothered" her my posting such a theory. It was only after objections from others that she re-posted it citing the following:
Political Discussions
As a guideline I would like to limit direct political discussions to one thread. You are welcome to discuss the issues and the positions that the candidates take on certain issues. If there is a non-campaign issue related to politics I may allow a 2nd thread but please check with one of the mods first.
http://prophecynewswatch.com/message/viewtopic.php?t=27687
Sue
As a response to this, I sent the following:
To: Sue
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:35 am
Sorry. I thought I was bringing a theory to the board for discussion. I wasn't aware that its content was interpreted as "political".
Please, keep me informed as to the results from your review. I would like to hear how you came to your conclusions as to the nature of my post so further interpretations of my posts can be avoided. I'll be awaiting your response.
Thank you
This request received the following:
From: Sue
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:48 am
"Sorry. I thought I was bringing a theory to the board for discussion. I wasn't aware that its content was interpreted as political.
Please, keep me informed as to the results from your review. I would like to hear how you came to your conclusions as to the nature of my post so further interpretations of my posts can be avoided. I'll be awaiting your response."
Thank you
I moved your thread back to the Prophecy section. I think your theory has merit.
Click Here: http://prophecynewswatch.com/message/viewtopic.php?t=31535
I was uneasy with you stating " ties to terrorist (or terrorism), whether directly or indirectly"... about Obama; a candidate running for the office of President of the U.S. As far as I know he has no ties to terrorist "directly or indirectly". IMO your theory works just as well with a candidate who has no terrorist ties but would be sympathetic to the Muslim, radical Islam's.
Blessings
Sue
My statement (theory) she was referring to dealt with his father having being Muslim. And that growing up under this religious influence, he would have been exposed to the Muslim intolerance of the Christian views and Jews living in Israel. Or are we to believe that like Rev. Jeremiah Wright, President Obama never heard anything anti-semitic by any Muslim including his own father? PLEASE! I have more common sense than that. I have heard that prejudicial rhetoric in our V.A. Hospitals from black patients and some of our "so-called" Christian churches. Maybe many of you have too. In any case, with the recent suggestion that the 9/11 prisoners from GITMO coming back to NYC so they can stand trial, giving them the platform to justify the attacks, only helps to prove my "theory" as well as hurt those who lost loved ones on that tragic day. Way to go Mr. "Messiah".
Remember this photo?
I haven't heard of the Obama's deciding on a Christian church in Washington D.C. to attend. Even after selling the country on the idea that he is Christian during his campaign. Have you? The best way to bring down America seems to be from within. First divide the nation on things like "WHO" really won the 2000 election, the war or terror, GAY marriage and any other thing that raises public descention, then elect people whose policies will eventually BANKRUPT the country and conquer those same people from within. Was this the change you liberals wanted?
Wasn't it Ronald Reagan who used this same strategy against the Soviet Union before their fall in the 1980s? I guess the Muslims were paying attention and decided to stir the egos of Liberals stupid enough to fall in line. Others they found with either bribes, campaign promises and / or contributions. Some of which still remain in office. They know who they are even if we ( the American people ) don't. So, you liberals better enjoy the ride while it lasts. But keep in mind that there will be a "Judgment Day". And that will be a day when we all will have to pay the fiddler for this "change" most of you Obama supporters voted for.
And the way it's looking, that day could be as soon as tomorrow.
Under former President George W. Bush, federal spending for 2008 was $2,979 Billion Dollars. It broke down this way:
Note: Chart excludes US$188 billion earmarked towards "activities in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere in the war on terrorism".
Now that Barack Obama is the president and Democrat's have control in both houses of Congress over the past 11 months, you who voted for "change" are now feeling the effects of that change where it hurts the most.
Your WALLETS!
In spite of the August town hall meetings and TEA PARTY protests, those elected officials have continued their pursuit to destroying the way of life our country's founding fathers fought against. TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION! Our country already had a deficit in 2008. And although I would agree that it was somewhat high, that deficit was at least manageable.
With all the spending on Obamacare as well as over 10% unemployment in the country, what's next?
BANKRUPTCY!
Just look at the proposed budget over the next 10 years below.
And this only took 11 months. Aren't any of you afraid of what is in store for America should this continue for the rest of his term? I am. And we still have a year before we can elect the necessary, responsible people able to put a stop to it. WAS THIS THE "CHANGE" YOU WERE LOOKING FOR?
I used to be a member of a Bible group called Prophecy News Watch ( located in Canada ). I left this group because some of its moderators tend to be "censor" happy when it comes to posts they personally disagree with. On one such post I had a theory of a scenario in which an Obama administration would place the country against Israel. The Bible prophesied that during the last days the "whole world" would be against Israel, including the United States. My "theory" ( posted in mid 2008 ) involved the Islamic world was planning and waiting for a president ( Obama ) who would sympathize with them. That through that president, they could ( and would ) destroy America from within. I was CENSORED for my theory by one of their moderators ( Sue ). It "bothered" her my posting such a theory. It was only after objections from others that she re-posted it citing the following:
Political Discussions
As a guideline I would like to limit direct political discussions to one thread. You are welcome to discuss the issues and the positions that the candidates take on certain issues. If there is a non-campaign issue related to politics I may allow a 2nd thread but please check with one of the mods first.
http://prophecynewswatch.com/message/viewtopic.php?t=27687
Sue
As a response to this, I sent the following:
To: Sue
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:35 am
Sorry. I thought I was bringing a theory to the board for discussion. I wasn't aware that its content was interpreted as "political".
Please, keep me informed as to the results from your review. I would like to hear how you came to your conclusions as to the nature of my post so further interpretations of my posts can be avoided. I'll be awaiting your response.
Thank you
This request received the following:
From: Sue
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:48 am
"Sorry. I thought I was bringing a theory to the board for discussion. I wasn't aware that its content was interpreted as political.
Please, keep me informed as to the results from your review. I would like to hear how you came to your conclusions as to the nature of my post so further interpretations of my posts can be avoided. I'll be awaiting your response."
Thank you
I moved your thread back to the Prophecy section. I think your theory has merit.
Click Here: http://prophecynewswatch.com/message/viewtopic.php?t=31535
I was uneasy with you stating " ties to terrorist (or terrorism), whether directly or indirectly"... about Obama; a candidate running for the office of President of the U.S. As far as I know he has no ties to terrorist "directly or indirectly". IMO your theory works just as well with a candidate who has no terrorist ties but would be sympathetic to the Muslim, radical Islam's.
Blessings
Sue
My statement (theory) she was referring to dealt with his father having being Muslim. And that growing up under this religious influence, he would have been exposed to the Muslim intolerance of the Christian views and Jews living in Israel. Or are we to believe that like Rev. Jeremiah Wright, President Obama never heard anything anti-semitic by any Muslim including his own father? PLEASE! I have more common sense than that. I have heard that prejudicial rhetoric in our V.A. Hospitals from black patients and some of our "so-called" Christian churches. Maybe many of you have too. In any case, with the recent suggestion that the 9/11 prisoners from GITMO coming back to NYC so they can stand trial, giving them the platform to justify the attacks, only helps to prove my "theory" as well as hurt those who lost loved ones on that tragic day. Way to go Mr. "Messiah".
Remember this photo?
Wasn't it Ronald Reagan who used this same strategy against the Soviet Union before their fall in the 1980s? I guess the Muslims were paying attention and decided to stir the egos of Liberals stupid enough to fall in line. Others they found with either bribes, campaign promises and / or contributions. Some of which still remain in office. They know who they are even if we ( the American people ) don't. So, you liberals better enjoy the ride while it lasts. But keep in mind that there will be a "Judgment Day". And that will be a day when we all will have to pay the fiddler for this "change" most of you Obama supporters voted for.
And the way it's looking, that day could be as soon as tomorrow.
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
"Season's Greeting" From Your Friendly Neighborhood "TERRORIST" .
WELL, it's that time of the year again.
"THANKSGIVING". A time for families getting together to give thanks to God for getting through this past year relatively safe. Some, if not all, will celebrate by having turkey stuffed with stuffing passed down from their mom's ( or grandma's ) own recipe, while yet others will be watching those parades and, of course, the annual Dallas Cowboys and Detroit Lions football games. And following those games and the parting of ways that must eventually come, most families will have "leftovers" to eat for the next week. And then, the very next day begins that first day over the next 30 to shop for those "perfect" Christmas gifts for the loved ones in their lives. Spending their life's savings or placing untold amounts on credit cards. We know it as "Black Friday".
However, this year "Black Friday" could take on a whole different meaning should "terrorist" decide to hit those "soft targets" they tend to seek for maximum effect.
NOW, I first want to point out that I have NO PROOF or INSIDE KNOWLEDGE of any such threats. MY INPUT IS STRICTLY SPECULATION. With that said, I want to point certain "facts" that most of you need to be reminded of. THIS WILL BE THE FIRST YEAR PRESIDENT OBAMA will have the responsibility of protecting us from any terrorist attack.
SINCE 9/11, under former President Bush, America wasn't attacked thanks to policies his administration put in place. People could shop with safety because of policies like the Patriot Act. We looked out for unusual purchase's from people. Purchase's like 15 - 20 or more cell phones, above normal requests for fertilizer, kerosene, even truck and plane reservations. Americans became more aware of those around them.
Since President Obama has taken office, there has been more activity from potential terrorist. We already have an example of that taking place.
FORT HOOD!
With so many "red flags" on Major Hasan, how in the world was he allowed to remain in the military? WHY DID 13 MURDERED SOLDIERS NEEDLESSLY DIE? WHY WERE SO MANY INJURED? WHO DROPPED THE BALL ON THIS ONE? WHO IS REALLY TO BLAME? It makes you wonder. Now doesn't it?
When a terrorist can murder soldiers on a military post ( which should be a difficult thing to do ), how do the President and his DHS Secretary ( Janet Napolitano ) expect the American citizens to believe softer targets like Walmart, Target, K-Mart and others will not be easier and tempting to those who want to escalate the fears most people already have?
Whether or not an attack does come, it's still up to us to be ever so vigilant in recognizing any signs of a potential threat. We need to be forever ready to protect our own potentially "soft targets" for ourselves. It's now become clear that the government won't.
Or is the correct word "can't".
Maybe they are just too distracted with HEALTH CARE or the ECONOMY. Or could the President of these United States suddenly have a backache from all the "bowing" he's done so far to foreign leaders around the world? Not to mention all that a$$ kissing to our enemies as well. I really don't know.
PERSONALLY, I think he's impotent and needs to grow a NEW pair ( if you know what I mean ). I guess Michelle "whipped" him early in their marriage. She is more like a Hillary Clinton than a Laura Bush. Wouldn't you agree?
Whatever it is, any "outgoing" White House cards that is to be sent to the American People this year should begin or end with the following line; " Have a SCARY "X"mas and a Happy New Year ( of fear ) ".
As politically correct as they are ( and want us to become ), I wouldn't be looking for the any words like "CHRISTMAS" or "PEACE" to be there anytime soon. After all, those words only express the real reason for the season.
Don't they?
"THANKSGIVING". A time for families getting together to give thanks to God for getting through this past year relatively safe. Some, if not all, will celebrate by having turkey stuffed with stuffing passed down from their mom's ( or grandma's ) own recipe, while yet others will be watching those parades and, of course, the annual Dallas Cowboys and Detroit Lions football games. And following those games and the parting of ways that must eventually come, most families will have "leftovers" to eat for the next week. And then, the very next day begins that first day over the next 30 to shop for those "perfect" Christmas gifts for the loved ones in their lives. Spending their life's savings or placing untold amounts on credit cards. We know it as "Black Friday".
However, this year "Black Friday" could take on a whole different meaning should "terrorist" decide to hit those "soft targets" they tend to seek for maximum effect.
NOW, I first want to point out that I have NO PROOF or INSIDE KNOWLEDGE of any such threats. MY INPUT IS STRICTLY SPECULATION. With that said, I want to point certain "facts" that most of you need to be reminded of. THIS WILL BE THE FIRST YEAR PRESIDENT OBAMA will have the responsibility of protecting us from any terrorist attack.
SINCE 9/11, under former President Bush, America wasn't attacked thanks to policies his administration put in place. People could shop with safety because of policies like the Patriot Act. We looked out for unusual purchase's from people. Purchase's like 15 - 20 or more cell phones, above normal requests for fertilizer, kerosene, even truck and plane reservations. Americans became more aware of those around them.
Since President Obama has taken office, there has been more activity from potential terrorist. We already have an example of that taking place.
FORT HOOD!
With so many "red flags" on Major Hasan, how in the world was he allowed to remain in the military? WHY DID 13 MURDERED SOLDIERS NEEDLESSLY DIE? WHY WERE SO MANY INJURED? WHO DROPPED THE BALL ON THIS ONE? WHO IS REALLY TO BLAME? It makes you wonder. Now doesn't it?
When a terrorist can murder soldiers on a military post ( which should be a difficult thing to do ), how do the President and his DHS Secretary ( Janet Napolitano ) expect the American citizens to believe softer targets like Walmart, Target, K-Mart and others will not be easier and tempting to those who want to escalate the fears most people already have?
Whether or not an attack does come, it's still up to us to be ever so vigilant in recognizing any signs of a potential threat. We need to be forever ready to protect our own potentially "soft targets" for ourselves. It's now become clear that the government won't.
Or is the correct word "can't".
Maybe they are just too distracted with HEALTH CARE or the ECONOMY. Or could the President of these United States suddenly have a backache from all the "bowing" he's done so far to foreign leaders around the world? Not to mention all that a$$ kissing to our enemies as well. I really don't know.
PERSONALLY, I think he's impotent and needs to grow a NEW pair ( if you know what I mean ). I guess Michelle "whipped" him early in their marriage. She is more like a Hillary Clinton than a Laura Bush. Wouldn't you agree?
Whatever it is, any "outgoing" White House cards that is to be sent to the American People this year should begin or end with the following line; " Have a SCARY "X"mas and a Happy New Year ( of fear ) ".
As politically correct as they are ( and want us to become ), I wouldn't be looking for the any words like "CHRISTMAS" or "PEACE" to be there anytime soon. After all, those words only express the real reason for the season.
Don't they?
Monday, November 16, 2009
Transparency?! "Right"!!
Does any of this sound familiar?
I wish our Presidential "Messiah" would see to it that Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid would be just as transparent as he pledged to be.
WAIT A MINUTE ! THEY ARE !!
According to an article written for Coral Ridge Ministries "FRONTLINES REPORT", Robert H. Knight wrote the following:
The Health Bill’s Stealth Homosexual Agenda
Thursday, Nov. 12, 2009 As the Senate works behind closed doors to combine the newly passed House health care takeover bill with two Senate versions that have already passed separate committees, special interest groups are rallying their members to lobby for favored provisions. The House bill, the Affordable Health Care for America Act (3962), passed on Nov. 7 by a vote of 220 to 215. The Senate’s timetable is unclear, with Majority Leader Harry Reid pledging to complete a bill before Christmas, but many observers say that this is unlikely because of the sheer immensity of the proposal and the growing opposition.
Among the biggest winners in the House version were homosexual activists. According to the Human Rights Campaign, the largest "gay" pressure group, the House bill contains several key elements that "have been part of HRC’s legislative agenda as free-standing bills for many years," says the group’s Website, which boasts that HRC lobbied hard to have them included. The only negative aspect in HRC’s eyes is the Stupak-Pitts amendment barring federal funding for abortions, which passed 240 to 194. HRC pledges to "work with our pro-choice coalition allies to help see that it is removed or revised as health care reform moves forward."
That’s a good bet, since President Obama promised Planned Parenthood that abortion subsidies would be part of health care reform. Key pro-homosexual provisions highlighted by HRC include:
Special treatment A section designating "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" as special categories would open up "health data collection and grant programs focused on health disparities related to sexual orientation and gender identity." The "gay" lobby, which has been promoting the fiction, especially among schoolchildren, that homosexual behavior is natural and poses no health risks, admits here that the behavior involves unique health problems. Unmentioned are astronomically higher rates of sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS among homosexual males, and increased rates of domestic violence, suicide, alcohol and drug abuse, and mental illness among both sexes.
Domestic partner tax benefits HR 3296 incorporates the language of the proposed Tax Equity for Health Plan Beneficiaries Act, which would apply marital-type tax advantages to same-sex couples. Currently, employer-provided health insurance costs for a married couple are excluded from gross taxable income. This is a way that companies and the tax code historically have supported marriage, which is regarded as a key factor in attracting the most stable, loyal employees. Under the bill, employees who have domestic partners would be treated the same as those with spouses.
More HIV funding for the states The bill incorporates the Early Treatment for HIV Act, which, according to HRC, "would permit state Medicaid programs to provide HIV treatment to individuals before they develop AIDS. The act would amend Title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide states with the option of covering low-income, HIV-positive people as ‘categorically needy.’ States taking advantage of this option would be provided with an enhanced federal Medicaid match." This is the only provision that might make some sense—getting aid to people before they develop full-blown AIDS. But it needs more examination in light of its impact on Medicaid, etc.
Pro-homosexual, comprehensive sex education HR 3962 provides funding for comprehensive condom-focused sex education programs, while leaving out abstinence programs, which HRC dismisses as "discriminatory" because they don’t facilitate "safe" gay sex. Given that after three decades of "comprehensive" sex ed, that homosexual males are still by far the largest category of AIDS cases and deaths and represent the lion’s share of syphilis and other STDs, the claim to be able to teach "safe" gay sex should be regarded as an oxymoron. The HRC also does not like the emphasis that abstinence programs put on delaying sex for marriage and supports programs that sexualize children at younger and younger ages.
Non-discrimination The bill "prohibits consideration of personal characteristics unrelated to the provision of health care." HRC sees this as elevating "sexual orientation" to a civil rights category within the health care system.
The two Senate versions so far "do not contain the important provisions for LGBT people incorporated in the House-passed bill," HRC notes, promising to lobby for final inclusion of its list.
ACTION
Please contact your two U.S. Senators and urge them to oppose HR 3962 and the two Senate health care takeover bills, S1796 and S1679. The Capitol switchboard is (202) 224-3121. Click here for additional contact information for your U.S. senators.
Robert H. Knight is Senior Writer and Washington, D.C., Correspondent at Coral Ridge Ministries. He is the author of Fighting For America’s Soul
Is it any wonder why the Democrat's win the White House and both houses in Congress every so often only to be swept from one or all positions 2 to 4 years later.
Face it America, since the Jimmy Carter years, I have never seen so much incompetence and deliberate acts of defiance against the wishes of the American people that they are suppose to represent. You would think that with the "TEA PARTY PROTESTS" and the August "TOWN HALL MEETINGS", leaders in both houses of Congress as well as the President would get the message. Even losing 2 governorships ( New Jersey and Virginia ) earlier this month didn't faze them.
Sink or swim, the Liberals in Washington D.C. have placed ALL THEIR EGGS in one basket on one last attempt to steal the souls of the American people. And they still have an "Ace in the hole" to play should they begin losing their control around the throat of the American People.
George W. Bush !!!
Think about it. Every time they feel pressure from the opposition to their Liberal agenda's, Democrat's play one of two cards. The BUSH CARD or the RACE CARD. And now that they see that the RACE CARD is no longer getting the traction it once had ( thanks to idiots like Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Janeane Garofalo, Bill Maher, Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow and many others ), it's now time to use the BUSH CARD.
Don't tell me you don't see this coming. A blind man could see this from a mile ahead. Why do you think Attorney General Eric Holder announced that self-proclaimed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other detainees held at the Guantanamo Bay facility in Cuba would be transported onto U.S. soil to face justice in civilian court?
So the courts can publicly embarrass the BUSH administration, the C.I.A., the military or any other government agency involved in the gathering of intelligence to protect America. If they can convince you that "water boarding" and "sleep deprivation" is torture, they hope you'll focus your attention on that instead of what they are doing. Remember how engrossed America became during the O.J. Simpson and Michael Jackson trials?
It will be the same way during the TERRORIST'S TRIALS. You can put money on it.
And while we vegetate on these 9/11 trials in N.Y.C., the Liberal Leadership is counting on the American people to forget to take the time to notice "little" things like actually READING THE BILLS that they pass, attending those time consuming TOWN HALL MEETINGS to object to PORK BARREL SPENDING, the RAISING OF TAXES to fund their agenda, as well as those subtle changes in our CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS that would allow them to RELINQUISH OUR OWN NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY over to a foreign power in order to form that ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT they so eagerly want.
Now, how is that for their so-called "transparency"?
I wish our Presidential "Messiah" would see to it that Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid would be just as transparent as he pledged to be.
WAIT A MINUTE ! THEY ARE !!
According to an article written for Coral Ridge Ministries "FRONTLINES REPORT", Robert H. Knight wrote the following:
The Health Bill’s Stealth Homosexual Agenda
Thursday, Nov. 12, 2009 As the Senate works behind closed doors to combine the newly passed House health care takeover bill with two Senate versions that have already passed separate committees, special interest groups are rallying their members to lobby for favored provisions. The House bill, the Affordable Health Care for America Act (3962), passed on Nov. 7 by a vote of 220 to 215. The Senate’s timetable is unclear, with Majority Leader Harry Reid pledging to complete a bill before Christmas, but many observers say that this is unlikely because of the sheer immensity of the proposal and the growing opposition.
Among the biggest winners in the House version were homosexual activists. According to the Human Rights Campaign, the largest "gay" pressure group, the House bill contains several key elements that "have been part of HRC’s legislative agenda as free-standing bills for many years," says the group’s Website, which boasts that HRC lobbied hard to have them included. The only negative aspect in HRC’s eyes is the Stupak-Pitts amendment barring federal funding for abortions, which passed 240 to 194. HRC pledges to "work with our pro-choice coalition allies to help see that it is removed or revised as health care reform moves forward."
That’s a good bet, since President Obama promised Planned Parenthood that abortion subsidies would be part of health care reform. Key pro-homosexual provisions highlighted by HRC include:
Special treatment A section designating "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" as special categories would open up "health data collection and grant programs focused on health disparities related to sexual orientation and gender identity." The "gay" lobby, which has been promoting the fiction, especially among schoolchildren, that homosexual behavior is natural and poses no health risks, admits here that the behavior involves unique health problems. Unmentioned are astronomically higher rates of sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS among homosexual males, and increased rates of domestic violence, suicide, alcohol and drug abuse, and mental illness among both sexes.
Domestic partner tax benefits HR 3296 incorporates the language of the proposed Tax Equity for Health Plan Beneficiaries Act, which would apply marital-type tax advantages to same-sex couples. Currently, employer-provided health insurance costs for a married couple are excluded from gross taxable income. This is a way that companies and the tax code historically have supported marriage, which is regarded as a key factor in attracting the most stable, loyal employees. Under the bill, employees who have domestic partners would be treated the same as those with spouses.
More HIV funding for the states The bill incorporates the Early Treatment for HIV Act, which, according to HRC, "would permit state Medicaid programs to provide HIV treatment to individuals before they develop AIDS. The act would amend Title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide states with the option of covering low-income, HIV-positive people as ‘categorically needy.’ States taking advantage of this option would be provided with an enhanced federal Medicaid match." This is the only provision that might make some sense—getting aid to people before they develop full-blown AIDS. But it needs more examination in light of its impact on Medicaid, etc.
Pro-homosexual, comprehensive sex education HR 3962 provides funding for comprehensive condom-focused sex education programs, while leaving out abstinence programs, which HRC dismisses as "discriminatory" because they don’t facilitate "safe" gay sex. Given that after three decades of "comprehensive" sex ed, that homosexual males are still by far the largest category of AIDS cases and deaths and represent the lion’s share of syphilis and other STDs, the claim to be able to teach "safe" gay sex should be regarded as an oxymoron. The HRC also does not like the emphasis that abstinence programs put on delaying sex for marriage and supports programs that sexualize children at younger and younger ages.
Non-discrimination The bill "prohibits consideration of personal characteristics unrelated to the provision of health care." HRC sees this as elevating "sexual orientation" to a civil rights category within the health care system.
The two Senate versions so far "do not contain the important provisions for LGBT people incorporated in the House-passed bill," HRC notes, promising to lobby for final inclusion of its list.
ACTION
Please contact your two U.S. Senators and urge them to oppose HR 3962 and the two Senate health care takeover bills, S1796 and S1679. The Capitol switchboard is (202) 224-3121. Click here for additional contact information for your U.S. senators.
Robert H. Knight is Senior Writer and Washington, D.C., Correspondent at Coral Ridge Ministries. He is the author of Fighting For America’s Soul
Is it any wonder why the Democrat's win the White House and both houses in Congress every so often only to be swept from one or all positions 2 to 4 years later.
Face it America, since the Jimmy Carter years, I have never seen so much incompetence and deliberate acts of defiance against the wishes of the American people that they are suppose to represent. You would think that with the "TEA PARTY PROTESTS" and the August "TOWN HALL MEETINGS", leaders in both houses of Congress as well as the President would get the message. Even losing 2 governorships ( New Jersey and Virginia ) earlier this month didn't faze them.
Sink or swim, the Liberals in Washington D.C. have placed ALL THEIR EGGS in one basket on one last attempt to steal the souls of the American people. And they still have an "Ace in the hole" to play should they begin losing their control around the throat of the American People.
George W. Bush !!!
Think about it. Every time they feel pressure from the opposition to their Liberal agenda's, Democrat's play one of two cards. The BUSH CARD or the RACE CARD. And now that they see that the RACE CARD is no longer getting the traction it once had ( thanks to idiots like Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Janeane Garofalo, Bill Maher, Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow and many others ), it's now time to use the BUSH CARD.
Don't tell me you don't see this coming. A blind man could see this from a mile ahead. Why do you think Attorney General Eric Holder announced that self-proclaimed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other detainees held at the Guantanamo Bay facility in Cuba would be transported onto U.S. soil to face justice in civilian court?
So the courts can publicly embarrass the BUSH administration, the C.I.A., the military or any other government agency involved in the gathering of intelligence to protect America. If they can convince you that "water boarding" and "sleep deprivation" is torture, they hope you'll focus your attention on that instead of what they are doing. Remember how engrossed America became during the O.J. Simpson and Michael Jackson trials?
It will be the same way during the TERRORIST'S TRIALS. You can put money on it.
And while we vegetate on these 9/11 trials in N.Y.C., the Liberal Leadership is counting on the American people to forget to take the time to notice "little" things like actually READING THE BILLS that they pass, attending those time consuming TOWN HALL MEETINGS to object to PORK BARREL SPENDING, the RAISING OF TAXES to fund their agenda, as well as those subtle changes in our CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS that would allow them to RELINQUISH OUR OWN NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY over to a foreign power in order to form that ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT they so eagerly want.
Now, how is that for their so-called "transparency"?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
