It's Hard To Believe That The "Good Old Days" Were Just Last Year.

Next time a person tells you that electing a Democrat would increase your taxes, I suggest you listen.


Under former President George W. Bush, federal spending for 2008 was $2,979 Billion Dollars.   It broke down this way:

Fiscal Year 2008 U.S. Federal Spending - Cash or Budget Basis.

Note: Chart excludes US$188 billion earmarked towards "activities in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere in the war on terrorism".

Now that Barack Obama  is the president and Democrat's have control in both houses of Congress over the past 11 months,  you who voted for "change" are now feeling the effects of that change where it hurts the most.


Your WALLETS!


In spite of the August town hall meetings and TEA PARTY protests, those elected officials have continued their pursuit to destroying the way of life our country's founding fathers fought against.   TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!   Our country already had a deficit in 2008.   And although I would agree that it was somewhat high, that deficit was at least manageable.


With all the spending on Obamacare as well as over 10% unemployment in the country, what's next?

   BANKRUPTCY!


Just look at the proposed budget over the next 10 years below.  

And this only took 11 months.   Aren't any of you afraid of what is in store for America should this continue for the rest of his term?   I am.   And we still have a year before we can elect the necessary, responsible people able to put a stop to it.   WAS THIS THE "CHANGE" YOU WERE LOOKING FOR?


I used to be a member of a Bible group called Prophecy News Watch ( located in Canada ).   I left this group because some of its moderators tend to be "censor" happy when it comes to posts they personally disagree with. On one such post I had a theory of a scenario in which an Obama administration would place the country against Israel.   The Bible prophesied that during the last days the "whole world" would be against Israel, including the United States.   My "theory" ( posted in mid 2008 ) involved the Islamic world was planning and waiting for a president ( Obama ) who would sympathize with them.   That through that president, they could ( and would ) destroy America from within.   I was CENSORED for my theory by one of their moderators ( Sue ).   It "bothered" her my posting such a theory.   It was only after objections from others that she re-posted it citing the following:



Political Discussions
As a guideline I would like to limit direct political discussions to one thread. You are welcome to discuss the issues and the positions that the candidates take on certain issues. If there is a non-campaign issue related to politics  I may allow a 2nd thread but please check with one of the mods first.
http://prophecynewswatch.com/message/viewtopic.php?t=27687

Sue

As a response to this, I sent the following:

To: Sue
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:35 am
 
Sorry. I thought I was bringing a theory to the board for discussion. I wasn't aware that its content was interpreted as "political".

Please, keep me informed as to the results from your review. I would like to hear how you came to your conclusions as to the nature of my post so further interpretations of my posts can be avoided. I'll be awaiting your response.

Thank you

This request received the following:

From: Sue
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:48 am

"Sorry. I thought I was bringing a theory to the board for discussion. I wasn't aware that its content was interpreted as political.

Please, keep me informed as to the results from your review. I would like to hear how you came to your conclusions as to the nature of my post so further interpretations of my posts can be avoided. I'll be awaiting your response."

Thank you 
 
I moved your thread back to the Prophecy section. I think your theory has merit.
Click Here: http://prophecynewswatch.com/message/viewtopic.php?t=31535

I was uneasy with you stating " ties to terrorist (or terrorism), whether directly or indirectly"... about Obama; a candidate running for the office of President of the U.S. As far as I know he has no ties to terrorist "directly or indirectly".   IMO your theory works just as well with a candidate who has no terrorist ties but would be sympathetic to the Muslim, radical Islam's.

Blessings
Sue


My statement (theory) she was referring to dealt with his father having being Muslim.  And that growing up under this religious influence, he would have been exposed to the Muslim intolerance of the Christian views and Jews living in Israel.   Or are we to believe that like Rev. Jeremiah Wright, President Obama never heard anything anti-semitic by any Muslim including his own father?   PLEASE!   I have more common sense than that.   I have heard that prejudicial rhetoric in our V.A. Hospitals from black patients and some of our "so-called" Christian churches.  Maybe many of you have too.   In any case, with the recent suggestion that the 9/11 prisoners from GITMO coming back to NYC so they can stand trial, giving them the platform to justify the attacks, only helps to prove my "theory" as well as hurt those who lost loved ones on that tragic day.   Way to go Mr. "Messiah".


Remember this photo?

I haven't heard of the Obama's deciding on a Christian church in Washington D.C. to attend.   Even after selling the country on the idea that he is Christian during his campaign.   Have you?   The best way to bring down America seems to be from within.   First divide the nation on things like "WHO" really won the 2000 election, the war or terror, GAY marriage and any other thing that raises public descention,  then elect people whose policies will eventually BANKRUPT the country and conquer those same people from within.    Was this the change you liberals wanted?


Wasn't it Ronald Reagan who used this same strategy against the Soviet Union before their fall in the 1980s?   I guess the Muslims were paying attention and decided to stir the egos of  Liberals stupid enough to fall in line.  Others they found with either bribes, campaign promises and / or contributions.    Some of which still remain in office.    They know who they are even if we ( the American people ) don't.    So, you liberals better  enjoy the ride while it lasts.   But keep in mind that there will be a "Judgment Day".   And that will be a day when we all will have to pay the fiddler  for this "change" most of you Obama supporters voted for.

And the way it's looking,  that day could be as soon as tomorrow.

"Season's Greeting" From Your Friendly Neighborhood "TERRORIST" .

WELL, it's that time of the year again.

"THANKSGIVING". A time for families getting together to give thanks to God for getting through this past year relatively safe. Some, if not all, will celebrate by having turkey stuffed with stuffing passed down from their mom's ( or grandma's ) own recipe, while yet others will be watching those parades and, of course, the annual Dallas Cowboys and Detroit Lions football games. And following those games and the parting of ways that must eventually come, most families will have "leftovers" to eat for the next week. And then, the very next day begins that first day over the next 30 to shop for those "perfect" Christmas gifts for the loved ones in their lives. Spending their life's savings or placing untold amounts on credit cards. We know it as "Black Friday".

However, this year "Black Friday" could take on a whole different meaning should "terrorist" decide to hit those "soft targets" they tend to seek for maximum effect.

NOW, I first want to point out that I have NO PROOF or INSIDE KNOWLEDGE of any such threats. MY INPUT IS STRICTLY SPECULATION. With that said, I want to point certain "facts" that most of you need to be reminded of. THIS WILL BE THE FIRST YEAR PRESIDENT OBAMA will have the responsibility of protecting us from any terrorist attack.

SINCE 9/11, under former President Bush, America wasn't attacked thanks to policies his administration put in place. People could shop with safety because of policies like the Patriot Act. We looked out for unusual purchase's from people. Purchase's like 15 - 20 or more cell phones, above normal requests for fertilizer, kerosene, even truck and plane reservations. Americans became more aware of those around them.

Since President Obama has taken office, there has been more activity from potential terrorist. We already have an example of that taking place.

FORT HOOD!

With so many "red flags" on Major Hasan, how in the world was he allowed to remain in the military? WHY DID 13 MURDERED SOLDIERS NEEDLESSLY DIE? WHY WERE SO MANY INJURED? WHO DROPPED THE BALL ON THIS ONE? WHO IS REALLY TO BLAME? It makes you wonder. Now doesn't it?

When a terrorist can murder soldiers on a military post ( which should be a difficult thing to do ), how do the President and his DHS Secretary ( Janet Napolitano ) expect the American citizens to believe softer targets like Walmart, Target, K-Mart and others will not be easier and tempting to those who want to escalate the fears most people already have?

Whether or not an attack does come, it's still up to us to be ever so vigilant in recognizing any signs of a potential threat. We need to be forever ready to protect our own potentially "soft targets" for ourselves. It's now become clear that the government won't.

Or is the correct word "can't".

Maybe they are just too distracted with HEALTH CARE or the ECONOMY. Or could the President of these United States suddenly have a backache from all the "bowing" he's done so far to foreign leaders around the world? Not to mention all that a$$ kissing to our enemies as well. I really don't know.

PERSONALLY, I think he's impotent and needs to grow a NEW pair ( if you know what I mean ). I guess Michelle "whipped" him early in their marriage. She is more like a Hillary Clinton than a Laura Bush. Wouldn't you agree?

Whatever it is, any "outgoing" White House cards that is to be sent to the American People this year should begin or end with the following line; " Have a SCARY "X"mas and a Happy New Year ( of fear ) ".

As politically correct as they are ( and want us to become ), I wouldn't be looking for the any words like "CHRISTMAS" or "PEACE" to be there anytime soon. After all, those words only express the real reason for the season.

Don't they?

Transparency?! "Right"!!

Does any of this sound familiar?



I wish our Presidential "Messiah" would see to it that Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid would be just as transparent as he pledged to be.

WAIT A MINUTE !   THEY ARE !!


According to an article written for Coral Ridge Ministries "FRONTLINES REPORT",  Robert H. Knight wrote the following:

The Health Bill’s Stealth Homosexual Agenda



Thursday, Nov. 12, 2009 As the Senate works behind closed doors to combine the newly passed House health care takeover bill with two Senate versions that have already passed separate committees, special interest groups are rallying their members to lobby for favored provisions. The House bill, the Affordable Health Care for America Act (3962), passed on Nov. 7 by a vote of 220 to 215. The Senate’s timetable is unclear, with Majority Leader Harry Reid pledging to complete a bill before Christmas, but many observers say that this is unlikely because of the sheer immensity of the proposal and the growing opposition.


Among the biggest winners in the House version were homosexual activists. According to the Human Rights Campaign, the largest "gay" pressure group, the House bill contains several key elements that "have been part of HRC’s legislative agenda as free-standing bills for many years," says the group’s Website, which boasts that HRC lobbied hard to have them included. The only negative aspect in HRC’s eyes is the Stupak-Pitts amendment barring federal funding for abortions, which passed 240 to 194. HRC pledges to "work with our pro-choice coalition allies to help see that it is removed or revised as health care reform moves forward."


That’s a good bet, since President Obama promised Planned Parenthood that abortion subsidies would be part of health care reform. Key pro-homosexual provisions highlighted by HRC include:


Special treatment  A section designating "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" as special categories would open up "health data collection and grant programs focused on health disparities related to sexual orientation and gender identity." The "gay" lobby, which has been promoting the fiction, especially among schoolchildren, that homosexual behavior is natural and poses no health risks, admits here that the behavior involves unique health problems. Unmentioned are astronomically higher rates of sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS among homosexual males, and increased rates of domestic violence, suicide, alcohol and drug abuse, and mental illness among both sexes.


Domestic partner tax benefits  HR 3296 incorporates the language of the proposed Tax Equity for Health Plan Beneficiaries Act, which would apply marital-type tax advantages to same-sex couples. Currently, employer-provided health insurance costs for a married couple are excluded from gross taxable income. This is a way that companies and the tax code historically have supported marriage, which is regarded as a key factor in attracting the most stable, loyal employees. Under the bill, employees who have domestic partners would be treated the same as those with spouses.


More HIV funding for the states  The bill incorporates the Early Treatment for HIV Act, which, according to HRC, "would permit state Medicaid programs to provide HIV treatment to individuals before they develop AIDS. The act would amend Title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide states with the option of covering low-income, HIV-positive people as ‘categorically needy.’ States taking advantage of this option would be provided with an enhanced federal Medicaid match." This is the only provision that might make some sense—getting aid to people before they develop full-blown AIDS. But it needs more examination in light of its impact on Medicaid, etc. 


Pro-homosexual, comprehensive sex education  HR 3962 provides funding for comprehensive condom-focused sex education programs, while leaving out abstinence programs, which HRC dismisses as "discriminatory" because they don’t facilitate "safe" gay sex. Given that after three decades of "comprehensive" sex ed, that homosexual males are still by far the largest category of AIDS cases and deaths and represent the lion’s share of syphilis and other STDs, the claim to be able to teach "safe" gay sex should be regarded as an oxymoron. The HRC also does not like the emphasis that abstinence programs put on delaying sex for marriage and supports programs that sexualize children at younger and younger ages.


Non-discrimination The bill "prohibits consideration of personal characteristics unrelated to the provision of health care." HRC sees this as elevating "sexual orientation" to a civil rights category within the health care system.

The two Senate versions so far "do not contain the important provisions for LGBT people incorporated in the House-passed bill," HRC notes, promising to lobby for final inclusion of its list.

ACTION

Please contact your two U.S. Senators and urge them to oppose HR 3962 and the two Senate health care takeover bills, S1796 and S1679. The Capitol switchboard is (202) 224-3121. Click here for additional contact information for your U.S. senators.

Robert H. Knight is Senior Writer and Washington, D.C., Correspondent at Coral Ridge Ministries. He is the author of Fighting For America’s Soul



Is it any wonder why the Democrat's win the White House and both houses in Congress every so often only to be swept from one or all positions 2 to 4 years later.

Face it America, since the Jimmy Carter years, I have never seen so much incompetence and deliberate acts of defiance against the wishes of the American people that they are suppose to represent.   You would think that with the "TEA PARTY PROTESTS" and the August "TOWN HALL MEETINGS", leaders in both houses of Congress as well as the President would get the message.   Even losing 2 governorships ( New Jersey and Virginia ) earlier this month didn't faze them.

Sink or swim, the Liberals in Washington D.C. have placed ALL THEIR EGGS in one basket on one last attempt to steal the souls of the American people.  And they still have an "Ace in the hole" to play should they begin losing their control around the throat of the American People.

George W. Bush !!!

Think about it.  Every time they feel pressure from the opposition to their Liberal agenda's,  Democrat's play one of two cards.  The BUSH CARD or the RACE CARD.   And now that they see that the RACE CARD is no longer getting the traction it once had ( thanks to idiots like Rev. Jeremiah Wright,  Janeane Garofalo,  Bill Maher,  Keith Olbermann,  Rachel Maddow and many others ),  it's now time to use the BUSH CARD.

Don't tell me you don't see this coming.   A blind man could see this from a mile ahead.   Why do you think Attorney General Eric Holder announced that self-proclaimed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other detainees held at the Guantanamo Bay facility in Cuba would be transported onto U.S. soil to face justice in civilian court?


So the courts can publicly embarrass the BUSH administration, the C.I.A., the military or any other government agency involved in the gathering of intelligence to protect America.  If they can convince you that "water boarding" and  "sleep deprivation" is torture, they hope you'll focus your attention on that instead of what they are doing.  Remember how engrossed America became during the O.J. Simpson and Michael Jackson trials? 

It will be the same way during the TERRORIST'S TRIALS.  You can put money on it.

And while we vegetate on these 9/11 trials in N.Y.C., the Liberal Leadership is counting on the American people to forget to take the time to notice "little" things like actually READING THE BILLS that they pass, attending those time consuming TOWN HALL MEETINGS to object to PORK BARREL SPENDING, the RAISING OF TAXES to fund their agenda,  as well as those subtle changes in our CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS that would allow them to RELINQUISH OUR OWN NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY over to a foreign power in order to form that ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT they so eagerly want.  


Now, how is that for their so-called "transparency"?

Don't let your RIGHT hand know what your LEFT hand is doing.

COLUMN WRITER ROBERT H. KNIGHT wrote an article about that narrow weekend vote
of the health care bill passed by the House of Representatives.  Nancy Pelosi has put the first "nail" in the Democratic Party's coffin.  Harry Reid will soon get his turn at the hammer.  Then our "President" will take his swing.

This is just another reason why the 2nd Amendment has to be protected. ( More on that later. ) Right now, I want you to read this article.   Mr. Knight has a take on this subject that needs your attention.


House Passes Health Takeover in Late-Night Vote

Monday, Nov. 9, 2009 -- Despite an enormous pushback of e-mails, calls, faxes and a rally of 10,000 people on Capitol Hill on Thursday, the House voted 220 to 215 late Saturday night to pass the massive ObamaCare health takeover plan. The 1,990-page bill, titled the "Affordable Health Care for America Act" (HR 3962), now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to face far more opposition.


The narrow victory for the massive health takeover plan came after passage of the Stupak-Pitts amendment, which bars federal subsidies to health insurance plans that fund abortions. According to Accuracy in Media, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops threw their weight behind the measure, once the abortion amendment was approved. The New York Times reported that the bishops had told President Obama months ago that they would support the health care takeover as long as abortion was not covered.


Here’s how Operation Rescue President Troy Newman described what happened:

The Stupak-Pitts amendment, which will deny tax funding for abortions, handily passed with a vote of 240-194. Abortion funding had threatened to derail the entire House bill on health care with pro-life Democrats strongly opposed to Pelosi’s scheme to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions.

A plan to stop the bill by having the amendment fail with pro-life GOP members voting "present" was foiled when National Right to Life told them that they were going to score that vote as "pro-abortion" on their next electoral scorecard. The amendment, according to The Wall Street Journal, "gave cover to 40-some Democrats to support the larger bill."


The Journal, which described the bill as "a breathtaking display of illiberal ambition, intended to make the middle class more dependent on government through the umbilical cord of ‘universal health care,’" editorialized that the bill was ultimately anti-life, since "the government will have no choice but to ration medical care, starting with the aged and grievously ill." Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mi), who had said before the vote that even if his amendment failed, he could still vote for ObamaCare, "played the right-to-lifers like a Stradivarius," the Journal concluded.


However, RedState.com’s Eric Erickson, in a post entitled "Divided We Fall, warned Monday against finger-pointing among conservatives, saying, "Most of the Republican leaders on the Hill encouraged a "yes" vote for the Stupak Amendment because (A) its passage would send a strong message that there is a pro-life majority in the House of Representatives and (B) its passage would not affect the final outcome. Regardless of how you view Stupak, we know now there is a pro-life majority in even this Democratic House of Representatives, and Stupak very clearly will not affect the final outcome." Erickson, like others, predicts that the House-passed bill is "dead on arrival" in the Senate.


Abortion advocates Planned Parenthood and NARAL sharply rejected the Stupak Amendment and vowed to fight it in the Senate. Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richardson condemned House passage of the pro-life amendment and called it an "unacceptable addition to the health care reform bill." With its passage, she said in a statement, Planned Parenthood "has no choice but to oppose HR 3962."


Saturday’s narrow House vote for PelosiCare came four days after voters displayed their displeasure with Washington. The Nov. 3 Republican victories in New Jersey, and Virginia and even passage of the "people’s veto" of homosexual "marriage" in liberal Maine, have sent a message that opposition to the liberal political agenda is rising. So the House Democratic leadership twisted arms for a quick vote on the health bill.


Despite the final vote in the House, people who made the visits and calls should not feel their time was wasted. The harder it is for liberals to pass something, the more they fear doing it the next time. It also sends two messages to the Senate. Abortion could be the poison pill that ultimately will take the bill down. And leaders can ask legislators to fall on their swords and go against constituents only so many times.


Robert H. Knight is Senior Writer and Washington, D.C., Correspondent at Coral Ridge Ministries. He is the author of Fighting For America’s Soul (Coral Ridge Ministries, 2009).

You may want to check out this web site also: http://www.coralridge.org/medialibrary/default.aspx?mediaID=CRH0946_F.



NOW, I wish to point out something you are not hearing a lot about. The following events you are either hearing or reading about, while important, is just a distraction. That's right! A DISTRACTION!

Here is why I call it a distraction.

They ( the Liberals / Progressives ) have the power now. Recently, President Obama, through his Attorney General ( Eric Holder ) announced that self-proclaimed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other detainees held at the Guantanamo Bay facility in Cuba would be transported onto U.S. soil to face justice in civilian court.

Why?

I believe it is the Democrat's "ACE IN THE HOLE" should they be behind in the polls come time to vote in 2010 and 2012.

By having the trials here in America, the Liberal courts can push the blame on the Bush administration for the way they conducted the theater in the war on terror by exposing any and all interrogation techniques used. When the domestic policies fail you, fall back to foreign polices. It's an old game leaders have used when they want to change the subject. "Tricky Dick" Nixon used it with China during the time of the Watergate scandal. "Slick Willy" used foreign policies when he faced impeachment to avoid the disgrace of lying to the American people of his affair during Kenneth Starr's investigation into the relationship between President Clinton and Monica Lewinsky. Ten years ago, anyone who pointed out Bill or Hillary Clinton’s glaringly obvious lies were dismissed as extremists, kooks, dividers, liars, and talk radio robots. Now, for some odd reason — which has nothing to do with the media love affair with Obama — the mainstream media decided to investigate Hillary’s campaign speeches.

The conclusion: Hillary Clinton is a patholigical liar who will say or do anything to get elected.

Well, NO S--T SHERLOCK!!! The Clinton's got away with things that Richard Nixon never even dreamed of doing. And now we have leaders like Obama, Pelosi and Reid to take their place.

SO, lets take a look at this years "illusionists". How is their report card so far?

Consider what Obama and Congress has accomplished just since January:

--He has smeared medical doctors with reckless charges that they administer unnecessary courses of treatment for profit, e.g., tonsillectomies and limb amputations.

--He publicly berated Chrysler's senior creditors as a "small group of speculators" who "endanger Chrysler's future by refusing to sacrifice like everyone else," merely because they wouldn't acquiesce to his demands and insisted on asserting their contractual rights.

--He has demonized "big oil" and other energy producers, free market capitalists, corporate executives, pharmaceutical companies, Republicans who oppose his health care plan as dishonest and partisan, the wealthy, municipal policemen who dared arrest his Ivy League professor friend for disturbing the peace, pro-lifers, global warming skeptics, the CIA, the military, the best health care system in the world, and George W. Bush every time he needs cover for the inevitably negative consequences of his policies.

--He uses his White House blog to attack his political opponents.

--He condemned opponents of amnesty for illegal aliens as "demagogues."

--He foreshadowed his true nature in the campaign with his spontaneous denunciation of small-town Americans as bitterly clinging to their guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them.

--His administration has likened "tea party" protestors to an "angry mob" and "potential terrorists." His adviser David Axelrod has said they "are not in the mainstream and not in the majority" and represent "the angriest and most strident voices."

--In reference to opponents of his health care scheme, he said in a speech to a joint session of Congress, "I will not waste time with those who have made the calculation that it's better politics to kill this plan than improve it." He also said: "I don't want the folks who created the mess to do a lot of talking. I want them just to get out of the way so (Democrats) can clean up the mess." And this: "If you misrepresent what is in this plan, we will call you out."

--He has targeted and vilified the entire insurance industry for daring to oppose his plan, describing them as "those who would bend the truth -- or break it -- to score political points and stop our progress as a country," and accusing them of "filling the airwaves with deceptive and dishonest ads ... designed to mislead the American people." Even the liberal New York Times acknowledged Obama's use of "unusually harsh terms" in attacking the industry as being "interested only in preserving their own 'profits and bonuses.'" And in a true Stalinesque intimidation move, he is threatening to repeal the industry's antitrust exemption.

--He has abused the office of the presidency to personally attack Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and conservative talk radio in general. As we speak, his "czars" are devising schemes to shut down that very medium.

--Now he has launched an orchestrated attack against the only television network that makes a sincere effort at offering balance, Fox News Channel, in an attempt to isolate, demonize and delegitimize the organization because it won't follow suit and join the state-run media. The administration is vacillating between boycotting and allowing some administration officials to appear on the network. Obama singled Fox out as "entirely devoted to attacking my administration." Rahm Emanuel said it's "not a news organization so much as it has a perspective." David Axelrod said, "It's really not news; it's pushing a point of view." Axelrod implored ABC's George Stephanopoulos and his network "not to treat (Fox) as a news organization." White House communications director Anita Dunn, who has bragged about her success at controlling the media, said Fox is "like a wing of the Republican Party" that "spouts Republican talking points."

The common denominator of all these vicious White House attacks is that their targets are those who oppose the administration's agenda. Instead of selling its agenda the old-fashioned way -- by convincing the unconvinced -- it attacks those who dare to articulate and air the opposing point of view. This is a totalitarian, bullying administration, which is revealing its heightened state of panic and desperation over the public's growing awareness of the dangerousness of its policy prescriptions for America.

Want more proof?

The DHS under Janet Napolitano, is trying to demonize political dissent. And it's no big surprise who's directly in their crosshairs: supporters of the Second Amendment, including veterans and gun owners. Therefore, you and I are now being viewed as dangerous rightwing extremists that law enforcement officials need to be watching out for!

According to the MIAC report, if you oppose any of the following, you could qualify for being profiled as a potential dangerous "militia member":

The United Nations
The New World Order
Gun Control
The violation of Posse Comitatus
The Federal Reserve
The Income Tax
The Ammunition and Accountability Act
A possible Constitutional Convention
The North American Union
Universal Service Program
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)
Abortion
Illegal Immigration

With a report card such as this, DO YOU REALLY THINK THEY HAVE A SNOWBALLS CHANCE OF GETTING RE-ELECTED? Can America afford 7 more years of this obvious abuse of power ( or at the very least, "STUPIDITY" that borders closer and closer towards TREASON ).

I don't.

These Liberals in the Democrat Party have placed ALL their eggs in one basket. Health care is just the latest addition. They didn't care what we said at those town hall meetings in August. They have the majority in both houses. And in order to stay there, they plan to push the "Bush" button as long, hard and often as they can. They hope you'll be so engrossed in these trials ( as many were during the trials of O. J. Simpson and Michael Jackson ) you won't catch them rewriting history, laws and our CONSTITUTION. And Hollywood will help them as usual. If fact, it has already begun with movies like 2012 which is already in theaters. Already the focus of Americans are on the Earth's destruction, this time from a Mayan Prophecy. ( Whatever happened to that "global warming" crap they said would be our demise. )

See?   A DISTRACTION!

If you are stupid enough to still put your trust in Washington these days, I have some "swamp land" in Nevada and a "bridge" in San Fransisco to sell you.

REAL CHEAP!